Links to other  Web sites with  information on  LOTO

Case Study 2: Automotive Component Lubrication Robotics Correct. The interlocked gate would not meet the requirements for an energy isolation device. In this case, the interlocked gate is considered to be control circuitry which is expressly prohibited by the rule. It does not protect employees who are inside the fenced area because it fails to de-energize the robot arm. << Return to Case Study Discussion | Question 5 >>